The Polygraph Place

Thanks for stopping by our bulletin board.
Please take just a moment to register so you can post your own questions
and reply to topics. It is free and takes only a minute to register. Just click on the register link


  Polygraph Place Bulletin Board
  Professional Issues - Private Forum for Examiners ONLY
  Judge Approves New Voice Technology to Monitor Sex Offenders

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Judge Approves New Voice Technology to Monitor Sex Offenders
Taylor
Member
posted 11-15-2009 11:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Taylor   Click Here to Email Taylor     Edit/Delete Message
I received this news update:

Judge Approves New Voice Technology to Monitor Sex Offenders
Forensic - Amherst,NH,USA
Sex offenders can be required to submit to a Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA) examination as part of their post-release supervision to determine if ...

Judge Approves New Voice Technology to Monitor Sex Offenders
http://www.forensicmag.com/News_Articles.asp?pid=761

Sex offenders can be required to submit to a Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA) examination as part of their post-release supervision to determine if they are telling the truth, a federal court has ruled. Northern District of New York Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue ruled that the technique is analogous to polygraph examinations, which have been accepted by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as a way to monitor the activities of those under post-release supervision.

The 2nd Circuit in United States v. Johnson, 446 F.2d 272 (2006), held that both the CVSA and polygraphs were reliable, that they could be validly related to the post-release supervision of an offender, and that they did not deprive a defendant of his rights under the Fifth Amendment.

Advocates of voice stress analysis technology state that research has conclusively demonstrated the devices can detect otherwise inaudible voice inflections in responses to questions that can indicate whether a speaker is being truthful. Testimony before Judge Mordue indicated that some 1,800 law enforcement agencies in the United States have the devices available.

Although more than 1,800 law enforcement agencies utilize the system, including most major metropolitan agencies and the U.S. Military; the CVSA is not well known outside of the law enforcement community. As with the polygraph, results of the CVSA are not normally used in court, but rather serve as a guide to help eliminate individuals as suspects. A recent Department of Defense survey of law enforcement users of the CVSA reported that 86% found the CVSA to be either “very” or “extremely” accurate. The DoD survey also found that 75% of deceptive results were validated by obtaining a confession with “a very small error rate” (less than .5%) utilizing the CVSA.

The U.S. Patent Office recently awarded Charles Humble, the founder of the National Institute for Truth Verification (NITV), a second patent on an automated scoring algorithm for use on the CVSA. Humble was the first to quantify voice patterns and also discovered delayed stress reaction in voice stress analysis. The CVSA's current scoring algorithm, known as the Final Analysis Confirmation Tool (FACT), uses advanced mathematical algorithms and a built-in learning feature to recognize, evaluate, categorize, and quantify the output from the CVSA. The widely acclaimed CVSA II accurately scores each voice pattern for stress levels and then evaluates the entire examination to render a “No Deception Indicated” or “Deception Indicated” result, eliminating possible bias from the exam. Since the release of the CVSA II in early 2007, over 800 CVSA II’s have been delivered. “From the Atlanta P.D. to the Nashville P.D. to the California Highway Patrol, this is an investigative tool that has proven itself as invaluable in the field” stated Alan Hall, a retired officer of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, and the current Operations Administrator of the NITV.

For more information and to view recent case studies of cases using CVSA, go to www.cvsa1.com/

IP: Logged

BrunswickT
Member
posted 11-15-2009 06:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BrunswickT   Click Here to Email BrunswickT     Edit/Delete Message
Hello!

After reading all the propaganda, I have learned that the proponents are hucksters, with smoke and mirrors.

With that said, any referenced research or studies cited should be completely identified as a source.

Especially any federal study should cause DACA to jump on this with both feet, because I have not found any federal study that supports any voice stress instrument as being anything more than chance.

I posted a previous comment about
"Throwing Down the Gauntlet". This needs to be done at the highest independant level.

If these claims are not proven and publicized as a lie, then I know local LEO often take the easy way out because of case load. We will be soon out of a job.

If these claims are proven valid, then I will be at the head of the line to buy one in the pursuit of truth.

[This message has been edited by BrunswickT (edited 11-16-2009).]

IP: Logged

Ted Todd
Member
posted 11-15-2009 07:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ted Todd     Edit/Delete Message
BrunswickT,
Not only should DACA jump on this, but so should AAPP, APA, NPA, Limestone, Stoelting, Axciton, Lafayette and anyone else who is in the business of verifying the truth. The judge who approved this Voodo needs an education.

Ted

IP: Logged

cpolys
Member
posted 02-15-2010 11:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpolys     Edit/Delete Message
The report entitled, "Review of Voice Stress Based Technologies for the Detection of Deception" was posted on the APA website tonight. The executive summary and full report are available for download. Please feel free to disseminate the information.

IP: Logged

rcgilford
Member
posted 02-16-2010 07:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rcgilford   Click Here to Email rcgilford     Edit/Delete Message
If anyone has reseaarch to share with the judge, this address should get the information to him.

Chief Judge Norman A. MORDUE
Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse
P.O. Box 7336
Syracuse, NY 13261-7336

IP: Logged

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Polygraph Place

Copyright 1999-2008. WordNet Solutions Inc. All Rights Reserved

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.39c
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.